The Rocky Mountain Bean Dealers Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840799929
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Loveland, CO, USA
Phone
9704027152
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$118,493
Expenses
$105,716
Assets
$196,862
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KRAIG KELLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • COURTNEY SCHULER (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KRAIG KELLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • COURTNEY SCHULER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SAMUEL PECK (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organizations's primary exempt purpose is to advance the general interests of those engaged in the handling of beans throughout the rocky mountain states.

What it reported doing in 2024

To inculcate just and equitable principles in trade, establish and maintain uniform grades of beans and secure their adoption in the markets of the country, and to acquire, preserve and disseminate valuable business information and to define and enforce rules for arbitrating any differences that arise b/w buyers and sellers of beans.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 26
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.4%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.