The Riverside Sheriffs Charities Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861857597
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Riverside, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9519552469
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $397,284
- Expenses
- $131,687
- Assets
- $556,977
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHAD BIANCO (President)
People named in this filing
- CHAD BIANCO (President)
- NICOLE WILKINSON (Secretary)
- ROSE PERKINS (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our goal, through donations and fundraising events, is to provide assistance to local charitable organizations, youth organizations, organizations dedicated to assisting veterans and crime victims, scholarships to our local youth, community events, families of fallen officers, department members experiencing a catastrophic illness/injury or who are in need of mental health services, as well as the purchase of critical specialty and/or safety equipment. Recipients will be determined based on their individual need, with an objective of spreading our fundraising efforts to as many individuals and organizations as we can reach.Some potential fundraising activities that we plan to hold include: golf tournaments, fishing tournaments, a rodeo, trail rides, marathon runs, and other miscellaneous sporting events. These events will not only help to raise money for this great charity, but will also allow us to interact with our community while having a great time.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our goal, through donations and fund raising events, is to provide assistance to local charitable organizations, youth organizations, organizations dedicated to assisting veterans and crime victims, scholarships to our local youth, community events, families of fallen officers, department members experiencing a catastrophic illness/injury or who are in need of mental health services, as well as the purchase of critical specialty and/or safety equipment. Recipients will be determined based on their individual need, with an objective of spreading our fund raising efforts to as many individuals and organizations as we can reach.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.8%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 66.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.23; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -43% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 67.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 84.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28.8% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $114K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.