The Rights Practice Us Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263029396
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2008
Location
London, London, UK
Phone
6177802957
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,988
Expenses
$15,909
Assets
$77,223
Liabilities
$3,908

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES SEYMOUR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAMES SEYMOUR (PRESIDENT)
  • C M ABDUL MUYEED (CFO)
  • NICOLA MACBEAN (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The trp us has an objective of promoting human rights (as set out in the universal declaration of human rights and subsequent united nations conventions and declarations) through: monitoring abuses of human rights; researching human rights issues; providing technical advice on human rights matters; contributing to the sound administration of human rights law; and raising awareness.

What it reported doing in 2023

A small grant was provided to the rights practice uk for pink therapy project and it was successfully implemented.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 71.9%; rating input score 72

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -77%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.85; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -174.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 71.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.