The Richmond Ballet

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
546049848
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Richmond, VA, USA
Phone
8043440906
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Culture, and Humanities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,653,625
Expenses
$7,788,367
Assets
$14,711,015
Liabilities
$2,866,436

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

37 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SELINA RAINEY (PRESIDENT)
  • PHILIP GOODPASTURE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MAYA ERHARDT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MA CONG (ASSOC. ARTISTIC DIRECTOR): $138,286 total reported compensation
  • STONER WINSLETT (ARTISTIC DIRECTOR): $116,299 total reported compensation
  • MICHELLE MULLER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $102,523 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Through all of its programs, richmond ballet strives to expand access to dance for the benefit of the entire community. At the heart of the organization's mission, to awaken, uplift, and unite human spirits, is the conviction that the appetite and need for arts experiences is both universal and eternal. Engagement with the arts creates shared experiences that unite people of diverse backgrounds. Richmond ballet is committed to identifyingand carving pathways throughbarriers in access to these experiences for all members of the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Professional company performances - after a twenty-plus year career as a principal dancer and resident choreographer for tulsa ballet, ma cong joined richmond ballet as associate artistic director in 2019 and became artistic director in 2024. Ma has brought a vitality and enthusiasm to the company that is rooted in his history - a chinese-born naturalized citizen with a passion for humanity and the arts. During 2024 2025, richmond ballet reached a record-breaking 86,000 people through all programs.the 2024-2025 season included a final repertory performance at the richmond ballet studio theatre. This finale featured val caniparoli's provocative what's going on and a world premiere ballet by ma cong, enchalant. December of 2024 featured 17 performances of family-favorite the nutcracker. This production saw record attendance, and approximately 600 patrons were admitted free of charge, sponsored by "ballet for all" a program designed to diversify our audience. After the major success of ben stevenson's dracula in the prior year, richmond ballet presented his version of cinderella, in february of 2025, to audience and critical acclaim. Both of these full length story ballets were performed at the dominion energy center, a large traditional theatre in downtown richmond, accompanied by the richmond symphony.in the spring of 2025, richmond ballet moved the remainder of its repertory series to the newly renovated leslie cheek theatre inside the Virginia museum of fine arts ("vmfa"). The move doubled our audience capacity and allowed the ballet to schedule performances over a two-week period, permitting more options for attendance in a more accessible and populated location in richmond. As a part of the renovation, the leslie cheek theatre stage was renamed, "the armstrong family stage in honor of richmond ballet." newly named the "moving art" series, the inaugural performance, moving art one, featured three bold works, all of which were Virginia premieres: ma cong's pentaptych, christopher wheeldon's after the rain, and val caniparoli's lambarena. To close out the season in may, moving art two featured joshua l. Peugh's slump, stoner winslett's echoing past, and yury yanowsky's world premiere fading creatures. Touring continues to be a priority for richmond ballet. On october 18, 2024, richmond ballet brought the iconic carmina burana to the gaillard center stage in charleston, South Carolina. The richmond ballet studio company performed tours and lecture demonstrations at various schools and localities throughout the commonwealth of Virginia reaching an estimated 25,000 students and 4,000 community patrons.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some related-organization disclosures are missing.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 97%; rating input score 97; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.89; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 32 of 33 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 37 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $244K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.