The Rhodes Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 986000867
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oxford, UK
- Phone
- 5402277444
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- International Academic Exchange
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $81,148,666
- Expenses
- $79,251,374
- Assets
- $765,810,545
- Liabilities
- $66,490,533
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dr Elizabeth Kiss (Warden and CEO (Through 1/1/25))
- Sir Rick Trainor (Interim Warden and CEO (from January 2025))
- Dr Megan Kenna (SSF Executive Director)
- Evie O'Brien (Atlantic Institute Executive Director (through July 2024))
- Matt Goode (SSF Deputy Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Dr Megan Kenna (SSF Executive Director): $401,067 total reported compensation
- Dr Elizabeth Kiss (Warden and CEO (Through 1/1/25)): $369,583 total reported compensation
- Evie O'Brien (Atlantic Institute Executive Director (through July 2024)): $350,247 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Rhodes Trust is an educational charity which brings together and develops exceptional people who are impatient with the way things are and have the courage to act. Rise was founded in 2019 by Eric and Wendy Schmidt in partnership with the Rhodes Trust to support promising young people and provide them with opportunities that allow them to work together to serve others over their lifetimes. Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. The mission of Rise is to change the odds for the world’s most exceptional people from a young age and throughout their lives. By identifying emerging talent across all disciplines, we can support young people and their ideas as they work on solutions we can't even imagine today. Rise partners with trusted global institutions that have long been committed to supporting young people with the potential to build a b.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the year, The Rhodes Trust continued its partnership with The Mandela Rhodes Foundation (MRF). MRF provides young leaders from across the continent with a one- to two-year scholarship to study at Universities in South Africa and to participate in a residential leadership development program. Atlantic Institute: During the year to June 2025, the Institute hosted or co-hosted 34 virtual events attended by 541 participants; and five in-person events for over 400 people in total. Attendees included Atlantic Fellows, programme staff, Rhodes Scholars and representatives from other partnership organizations and allied groups. At the Global Atlantic Fellows Annual Convening in Oxford in July 2024, 170 Fellows and 31 staff from the seven Atlantic Fellows programmes across the world gathered to connect and learn together. This event included a welcome ceremony for the newest cohorts of fellows who have completed their programme. The Institute achieved a 94 per cent satisfaction rate from attendees, our highest rating yet. The Institute co-hosted a convening in Bogota, Colombia, with the human rights organization, Dejusticia, in October 2024. Atlantic Fellows gathered to explore planetary health and just transitions, ahead of the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP16) in Cali, Colombia that same month. A further in person convening for Fellows was held in Chile in November, to engage with creative approaches to address complex and challenging issues. The XR Lab ('Extended Reality') at Rhodes House received over 625 visitors, with almost half from outside the broader Rhodes community. The Lab hosted two residencies focused on health equity, and participated at the Rhodes Forum on Technology & Society 2024, at which an Atlantic Fellow won the Kevin Xu Innovation Challenge. Topics covered in the webinars and skills workshops hosted or co-hosted by the Atlantic Institute included human rights, African languages, how artificial intelligence can assist fundraising, carbon literacy training, climate justice, achieving reparations, and entrepreneurship. The Institute is working on the development of "The Equity Review," a biennial, open-access publication which will combine research, expert insights and grassroots narratives, with its potential partner, the Oxford University Press. The first issue is expected to be published in October 2026. The Institute's work with partners included the African Diaspora Network and Moore Philanthropy, focussed on investing in African and Black-owned and led businesses. The event was held during the Skoll World Forum in April 2025, and 80 investors and entrepreneurs discussed systemic barriers. The Institute's Oxford 'home from home', "Kopanong" (an African word meaning "a meeting place for diverse languages") hosted residencies in support of the broad Rhodes and Atlantic Fellows community. The conference and convening centre that was central to the refurbishment of Rhodes House completed June 23 has now enjoyed two full years of operation. All services are now bedded in, and commercial use is fully operational, and generating significant funding support.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 49% for direct work, and 51% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.66; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 93.7% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $72.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $401K · 35 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.7M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.