The Reverse Brain Drain Project Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810828933
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2123361234
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$12,431
Assets
$38,989
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR WALTON WEBSON (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • ROSEMARY WEBSON (VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DR WALTON WEBSON (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • ROSEMARY WEBSON (VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • CLAXTON DUBERRY (SECRETARY, TREASURER, DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The reverse brain drain project inc. Is a non-profit, non-stock corporation formed exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. Specifically, the organization's objectives are to support and conduct activities aimed at encouraging the development of civic and economic life and society for the benefit of local and underserved communities in antigua and barbuda and such other countries and territories as the corporation may determine from time to time.

What it reported doing in 2019

Activities for the year 2019 as follows: education training for education officers in singapore the ministry of education science and technology approached the organization and the directors agreed to sponsor travel airfare expenses for three staff members for training in singapore in the following areas:1. Technical and vocational education and training (tvet): the singapore experience (13 - 17 may 2019) 2. Transforming education in the 21st century (14 - 18 october 2019)community service/sagassum conferencethe organization decided to support the travel expense for a team of four to attend the international conference on sargassum in guadeloupe from october 23-26. This was the first international trade show and conference for sargassum seaweed research, management, and stakeholder groups. This conference aimed to lay the foundations for efficient and pragmatic cooperation in order to provide functional and operational responses to the problem of increasing sargassum outbreaks in our region. As well as bring together a network of governments and local authorities, civil societies, companies, researchers and academics tackling the issue. The organization paid for travel expenses for the four team members in the form of airfare and accommodations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.14; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.