NYC Housing Partnership

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133851936
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2018
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2015
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
(646) 217-3370
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL MARTIN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • SHELIA MARTIN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL MARTIN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • WILLIAM FREY (DIRECTOR)
  • STEVEN HOCHBERG (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Housing is more than a place to live. It is the foundation for opportunity.

What it reported doing in 2018

The residential integrated solutions corporation is one of several entities that work in conjunction with housing partnership development corporation. Hpdc acts as nyc's primary intermediary for construction of new, affordable homeownership housing. Hpdc lessens the burdens of government by facilitating involvement in federal, state, and municipal government housing programs. Hpdc has overseen construction of an average of 1,200 units annually through outside private sector builders and developer, and fulfills a unique role due to its emphasis on affordable homewownership for nyc residents. Risco has incorporated in september 1995 as an independent corporation with the authority to determine the eligibility of hpdc projects for disbursements from the program default fund. The organization is in the process of dissolving the entity.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -46.7% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -34.3% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 1 of 1 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 33 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.