The Refuge KY Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453827143
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Louisville, KY, USA
- Phone
- 5029049414
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $213,473
- Expenses
- $178,887
- Assets
- $48,884
- Liabilities
- $1,383
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARD WATSON (President)
- MINDY WATSON (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- RICHARD WATSON (President): $23,250 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Christian ministry and outreach to young people in the local
What it reported doing in 2017
The church has one sunday morning service per week with 230-270 in attendance. There is also one sunday evening service once a week geared directly to young people. This service has 150-200 in attendance there are two homeless outreach programs and several small group meetings.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.4%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 61.4%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.2%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 33.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.4% of revenue deployed · 61.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $110K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $23K · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 8 of 8 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.