The Redimere Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202892839
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Greenwood Village, CO, USA
Phone
7207719550
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$171,497
Expenses
$191,264
Assets
$85,858
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Harvey Powers (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Harvey Powers (President): $134,466 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Redimere Group is founded on Biblical principles, and exists to engage faith/Christ-centered individuals and organizations in a transformational process designed to strengthen, equip and unleash their redemptive potential for Christ's Kingdom. This mission is accomplished by providing leadership intensives, counseling services, education/training and organizational consulting to local churches and faith-based organizations through the leaders, staff, members and key supporters of the organization. Oganizations who cannot afford customary fees are prvided the needed services through scholarship funds, such that no person or organization that needs or desires our services will be turned away simply due to financial incapacity.

What it reported doing in 2024

Leadership Intensives: The organization conducted multiple intensives over the year with ministry leaders from various churches and Christian organizations. These intensives were designed to strengthen, equip and empower leaders in both their ministries and in their marriages and families. In addition, organization worked with leaders individually throughout the year in identifying and developing their leadership skills.Organizational Consulting: The organization conducted with organizations to increase the healthy function of leaders and staff. This involved skill development in leadership and the redemptive leadership model, conflict resolution, team process and crisis intervention. Education and Training: The organization conducted multiple preaching and teaching events at churches, faith-based graduate schools, and faith-based organizations with leaders from across the world. In addition, provided ongoing training and supervision to multiple Christian counselors in support of their ministries to local churches and Christian organizations. Developed Podcasts and videos with ministry leaders on various leadership topics.Counseling: The organization provided individual, marital and family therapy to clients referred by local churches and ministry organizations. When appropriate, closely coordinated client care with church leadership in the growth and development process of individuals, marriages and families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 49
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.8%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.5%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.8% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $163K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $134K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.