The Red and Orange House Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
306346085
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public Foundations

Reported finances

Expenses
$1,500
Assets
$3,706

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • Diane Elizabeth Sciarretta (Teacher)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Red & orange House has the sole activity past present and planned of conducting arts based programs designed to assist people in coping with and recovering from trauma and illness.

What it reported doing in 2025

Founded in 2014 Red and Orange House is based in San Francisco and works across the US. We partner with community organizations healthcare institutions and individuals to offer our arts-based program that with its signature focus on exploring and reimagining our relationship to our unique human bodies supports and celebrates the transformation and healing of people living through trauma and or illness. Served 25 people in 2025. Conducted the program using art materials on hand. We paid a teacher a few of $1500.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: NotEnoughData
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.47; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 100%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.1% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 4 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.