The Reading Clinic Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273005008
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Hockessin, DE, USA
Phone
2153958591
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Remedial Reading, Reading Encouragement

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,889
Expenses
$53,391
Assets
$52

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

People named in this filing

  • RAHMANDA CAMPBELL (CHAIRPERSON)
  • TRACY JOHNSON ROCKMORE (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The reading clinic, inc. Provides evidence-based diagnostic testing and cognitive educational therapy for children, adolescents and adults with attention deficits, executive function deficits, cognitive delays and dyslexia, the most common learning disability affecting 1 in 5.

What it reported doing in 2025

The reading clinic, inc. Provided evidence-based diagnostic testing and cognitive educational therapy to children, adolescents, and adults with dyslexia, adhd, attention deficits, executive function deficits, and cognitive delays. Services included individualized intensive intervention and enrichment programs through the reading clinic cyber academy (kindergarten through adult). The organization advanced community awareness of dyslexia as a civil rights and education equity issue through partnerships with the yale center for dyslexia and creativity, the african american museum in philadelphia, learning ally, and vessels of hope. The reading clinic played an instrumental role in advocacy efforts leading to the passage of Pennsylvania's dyslexia and early literacy intervention pilot program, signed into law by former governor tom corbett. Additionally, the organization trained and mentored educators on evidence- based practices for diverse learners and hosted community awareness events, including an annual dyslexia community awareness football camp. Program expenses for 2025 totaled 19,929, representing direct costs of educational supplies and instructional services delivered to program participants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40.5%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 40.1%; rating input score 40

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 40.5% of revenue deployed · 40.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.