The Ray Halbritter Charity Classic Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272795820
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Oneida, NY, USA
Phone
3158298977
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$117,147
Expenses
$103,481
Assets
$127,443
Liabilities
$15

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RAY HALBRITTER (CHAIRPERSON & PRESIDENT)
  • FRED PARKER (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RAY HALBRITTER (CHAIRPERSON & PRESIDENT)
  • FRED PARKER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARY JO BURDICK (TREASURER & SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the ray halbritter charity classic is to raise funds to support american indian charities and other charities in upstate and central New York. The ray halbritter charity classic will provide such support by organizing and operating charitable fundraising programs and events to benefit such charities and will encourage individuals and corporations to make contributions in support of these charitable causes.

What it reported doing in 2025

The ray halbritter charity classic provides funds to support american indian charities and other charities in upstate and central New York.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 83.1%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.7%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.4% of revenue deployed · 83.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.