The Rachel Rosenthal Company

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954184146
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3108390661
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,504
Expenses
$29,022
Assets
$66,637
Liabilities
$1,897

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS COUGHENOUR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • THOMAS COUGHENOUR (PRESIDENT)
  • JOAN SPITLER (SECRETARY)
  • KATE NOONAN (ARTISTIC DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The rachel rosenthal company is devoted to honoring rachels legacy by redefining the boundaries of theatre; to present thought-provoking experimental works encompassing the visual and peforming arts, and to communicating relevant social, environmental, cultural, gender, and spiritual issues to a broad public. The company worshops offer emeging artist, young and old, an arena in which to create, hone and present origninal work.

What it reported doing in 2025

To work collaboratively with artists from all disciplines and to conveythe tenets of the rachel rosenthal company pioneering form of spontaneouscollaboration through her companys theatrical productions and performance workshops.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,059%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.3; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -26.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.