The Q Mission C/o Christopher T Johns

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270931699
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Emerald Isle, NC, USA
Phone
2523545700
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$987
Expenses
$14
Assets
$9,480

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • CHRISTOPHER T JOHNS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create and allow average americans the oppourtunity to make and impact on the less fortunate third world countries. The concept is simple and the impace is life giving and life changing. The basic principle at work is to allow people who are dining out in full service resturants the opportunity to partner together with oter diners all accross teh country to provide clean drinking water to those who do not have it. We simply invite teh diner to make a .25 donatation for a glass of water. This will allow the diner to be made aware of the problem that exists and also be aware of how something that is simply taken for granted here in the united states is something so valuable to those who do not have it. The .25 amount keeps the central idea in check that it does not require a lot to make a big difference if it is placed in the right hands.

What it reported doing in 2025

Building two clean water wells in third world counties

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.4%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 98.6%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 677.14; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -84.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -21.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $14 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.