The Program for Female Offenders of South Central Pennsylvania Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251580223
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
York, PA, USA
Phone
7172389950
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rehabilitation Services for Offenders

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$353,631
Expenses
$792,357
Assets
$888,063
Liabilities
$208,298

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE LEIST (CEO)
  • JANELLE GREEN (PRESIDENT)
  • COREY WOLFE (FORMER CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • COREY WOLFE (FORMER CEO): $82,950 total reported compensation
  • DANIELLE LEIST (CEO): $66,770 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To serve and advocate for individuals returning to the community and their support systems in promoting healthy and productive lives.

What it reported doing in 2024

The mentoring program strives to provide our clients with the opportunities to strengthen their lives by building trusting relationships with mentors who offer guidance encouragement, and nonjudgmental support. The mentoring program is a 9-12-month commitment. Our mentors are known for their expertise, compassion, and advice while modeling pro-social behaviors. Our mentoring models: one-on-one mentor and mentee are paired and decide when and where to meet groups a number of individuals together facilitated by a mentor meets several times in a month combination mentees have a one-on-one mentor and meet with groups. Expenses: 96,204 the workforce development program assists individuals in acquiring new job skills. The program has been consistent in its promotion and enhancement of workforce development and vocational support for men and women ex- offenders. This program offers a computer lab to assist those on state and county parole in all aspects of workforce development. After a comprehensive intake, someone is always there to help one through a comprehensive job search, with a focus on long term sustainable employment. The workforce development initiative provides: assistance in acquiring a ged or high school diploma soft skills (i.e. Communication, dress, attitude, self-talk) customer service skills training job training and "people skills" federal bonding computer literacy resume assistance job placement assistance financial literacy mentoring wrap around services expenses: 82,300

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 62% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 74.4%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2,353.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -124.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.9%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 74.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $590K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $83K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.