The Producers Club of Md Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521828837
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4107528083
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,617,833
Expenses
$1,636,998
Assets
$19,056,053
Liabilities
$2,716,750

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SANDRA GIBBON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - OUTGOING)

People named in this filing

  • JED DIETZ (DIRECTOR (FOUNDER) - OUTGOING)
  • GORDON GLENN OUTGOING (DIRECTOR - OUTGOING)
  • SCOT SPENCER (CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule othe mission of the corporation is to bring films, filmmakers, and audiences together in a friendly, inclusive atmosphere that reflects the unique aspects of our community, while participating in and adding to the larger film dialogue across the country and across the world, film for everyone.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2017, the corporation grew from a five-day film festival into the owner and operator of a threescreen, year-round movie theater complex, the stavros niarchos foundation parkway, leading an effort to transform the role of film and film culture in Maryland. Baltimore's newest cultural hub, the snf parkway theatre provides year-round film, digital video, educational offerings, community initiatives, special events, and live music concerts in station north arts & entertainment district, the geographic center of baltimore city. The organization has also partnered with the johns hopkins university and Maryland institute college of art ("mica") joint graduate film and media studies program to use the space as both a classroom, screening, and education space, offering the community access to an educational component to the organization's film offerings. The world-wide spread of a novel coronavirus ("covid-19") and related variants in 2020 and 2021 dramatically altered the corporation's activities. State of Maryland and baltimore city covid-19 executive orders forced the corporation to close its flagship parkway theatre on march 13, 2020, and the theatre remained closed to the public until august 2021 due to the enduring pandemic. To continue to serve audiences and the community with memorable film and cultural experiences, management quickly pivoted to develop and launch one of the first virtual movie theater and livestream platforms in the united states in april 2020 and transitioned its signature program, the Maryland film festival, online for both 2021 and 2022. The enduring covid-19 pandemic created new challenges for the film festival as it did for countless other arts organizations. The film industry experienced dramatic changes, and filmgoers' habits changed and continue to evolve. The organization was excited about the promise of audiences returning when the parkway theatre reopened in august 2021, but attendance at the annual festival, screenings and events has not returned to pre-pandemic levels. Given these continuing challenges, the Maryland film festival board of directors made the difficult decision to scale back the organization's operations and pause screenings, programs, and events. With public events paused, the Maryland film festival has prioritized and undertaken a re-envisioning process to develop a new business model and plan that will chart the future trajectory of the organization, including the annual film festival, and the operations of the parkway theatre. The 2023 film festival was postponed, and the board has committed to mounting a memorable 25th anniversary festival in the spring of 2024. The corporation's goal is to ensure that the organization remains a vital community asset for many years to come.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 79.3%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $29.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.64; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.8% of revenue deployed · 79.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 23 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $346K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.