The Pro-Voice Project
Legal name: The Pro-voice Project Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991310528
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Sandpoint, Idaho, US
- Phone
- 2082745522
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Reproductive Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $183,730
- Expenses
- $98,701
- Assets
- $84,712
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER JACKSON QUINTANO (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JENNIFER JACKSON QUINTANO (PRESIDENT)
- CYNTHIA DALSING (SECRETARY/ T)
- SARA LAWALL (VICE-PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Pro-Voice Project is an Idaho-based nonprofit advancing reproductive rights and reducing abortion stigma in rural areas through storytelling and creating spaces for honest community dialogue.
What it reported doing in 2024
"worth of a woman" traveling exhibit & public programs pvp completed and toured the "worth of a woman" exhibit-an educational and artistic display exploring systemic barriers to reproductive healthcare access-to five Idaho venues from sandpoint to coeur d'alene, ketchum, and boise. Woaw presents original portraiture, data visualizations, and first- person narratives about women's healthcare experiences. Host sites offered attendant programs-author talks, facilitated community conversations, and radio segments-reaching an estimated 3000 attendees, viewers, and listeners. Host feedback highlighted improved community dialogue and increased understanding of the human impacts of Idaho's reproductive healthcare landscape.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.1%; rating input score 27
- Program expense ratio: 50.4%; rating input score 50
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: 12 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 27.1% of revenue deployed · 50.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $50K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 27/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.