The Players Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 590711182
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Sarasota, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9413652494
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $866,181
- Expenses
- $2,504,419
- Assets
- $4,730,697
- Liabilities
- $741,533
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM SKAGGS (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM SKAGGS (CEO): $102,375 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The players theatre's mission is to entertain, educate, and engage the community in high quality live theatre.
What it reported doing in 2024
Sarasota's first and oldest performing arts organization, second oldest in the state of Florida, began in 1930, in the midst of the great depression, with a season of one-act plays. Two hundred and eighty-one members/patrons each paid a two-dollar subscription fee for the series.the players first permanent home was built of native pecky cypress in 1936. The original theatre seated two hundred forty six and cost just over $9,000. The pecky cypress building was torn down to make room for the next theatre on north tamiami trail, which opened in january 1974, seating four hundred ninety seven. That facility was sold in 2018 and vacated in october 2020 at the height of closures related to the covid-19 pandemic. The players performed in various indoor and outdoor venues until opening an indoor venue of its own again in december 2021 at 3501 s. Tamiami trail in the crossings at siesta key.the players theatre has achieved a reputation for quality productions and for creating programming that entertains, educates, and enlightens. The theatre serves a diverse audience with memorable and meaningful year-round performing arts that includes the broadway theatre series, the snap (something new at players) series, the summer sizzler series, the players playwriting festival, concerts, and community partnerships.the players strives to achieve the highest possible artistic quality in the context of a volunteer based theatre. Artistic leadership from some of the area's best professional directors, music directors, choreographers, set, lighting and costume designers, create an environment that challenges everyone to achieve high artistic standards.the players maintains affordable ticket prices, from $5 to $35, ensuring the experience of live theatre is available to as many people as possible. The players also provides over thirty-five hundred complimentary tickets to local community service agencies each year through its charity preview performance program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 48.4%; rating input score 48
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -189.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.89; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 48.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $102K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.