The Pink Ribbon Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421681566
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Hattiesburg, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6015502503
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health, General and Financing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $73,774
- Expenses
- $46,556
- Assets
- $230,875
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christy Amay (President)
- Tonya Creech (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Christy Amay (President)
- Tonya Creech (Vice President)
- Rebecca Roberts (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide compassionate financial assistance to residents of the Pine Belt counties in south Mississippi for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, as well as quality of life issues related to the illness. The Pine Belt counties include the Mississippi counties of Covington, Forrest, Jones, Jefferson Davis, Lamar, Marion, Pearl River, Perry, and Stone. Our purpose is to exemplify our motto Help, Hope, & Healing".
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization provides financial assistance to approved applicants to cover costs related to treatment for breast cancer. The assistance provided includes: (1) payment of medical expenses & bills, such as hospital, doctor, radiology costs, medications, insurance deductibles, and diagnostic mammograms; (2) procurement and distribution of specialty equipment & devices including prosthetics, lymph edema sleeves & gloves, undergarments, and wigs; and (3) procurement & distribution of gas cards for transportation assistance as well as costs of mentoring. Total benefactors of the program services were 59 individuals during the current year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.8%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.96; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.8% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.