The Pink Connection

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993910278
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Corpus Christi, TX, USA
Phone
3617740002
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$127,641
Expenses
$48,945
Assets
$142,662
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CLAUDIA MOSTAGHASI (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIELA RIVERA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MELBA RESENDEZ (DIRECTOR)
  • SABRINA GUTIERREZ (DIRECTOR)
  • YVONNE LOPEZ (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Pink Connection is a compassionate nonprofit organization committed to offering vital emergency funds to individuals affected by breast cancer. Our mission is to alleviate the financial burden that accompanies this challenging diagnosis, enabling patients to focus on their recovery and well-being. By fostering a supportive community and providing essential resources, we aim to bring hope and strength to those battling breast cancer, ensuring they never face this journey alone.

What it reported doing in 2024

To alleviate the financial burden that accompanies the challenges of a breast cancer diagnosis, enabling patients to focus on their recovery and well-being.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 38.3%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 61.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.91; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 181.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 58.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 76.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 38.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.