The Pillar of Hope Worldwide Outreach
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383838470
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Cocoa, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3216365561
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $395,050
- Expenses
- $394,730
- Assets
- $2,571
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LASHONDA SMITH (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- LASHONDA SMITH (PRESIDENT): $37,650 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide educational services to students in k-12 school. We are a private non profit school.
What it reported doing in 2021
The purpose of the organization is to train, equip and educate students to prepare them foe life.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 31
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 84.5%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 84.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $399K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $38K · 1 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $46K reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.