The Perry Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450391706
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- West Fargo, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7012419289
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,637,058
- Expenses
- $1,196,061
- Assets
- $4,505,995
- Liabilities
- $623,332
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- NATHANIEL DOUGLAS (EXECUTIVE DI): $163,007 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the perry center is to minister the love of jesus christ to single women experiencing an unplanned pregnancy by providing for their physical, emotional and spiritual needs in a residential setting.
What it reported doing in 2025
The perry center is a maternity home located in west fargo serving women ages 12 to 42 who are facing an unexpected pregnancy. The mission of the perry center is to provide for each woman's physical, emotional, and spiritual needs within a supportive residential environment. As a faith- based ministry, the perry center offers shelter, nutritious meals, education, mentoring, discipleship, job training, and structured support to equip women to pursue healthy, independent lives for themselves and their children. In 2025, the perry center significantly expanded its residential facility, increasing capacity from 9 bedrooms to 33 bedrooms. As part of this expansion, the organization added an on-site medical clinic to provide prenatal and postnatal care for residents and their children, including access to ultrasound services. The clinic is operated in partnership with sanford health, which provides medical oversight and physician services. The expanded facility positions the organization to serve more women and children in need and reflects a growing demand for safe, supportive housing within the community. In 2025, the perry center received referrals from a wide network of community partners, including physicians, wic, social services, hospitals, clinics, churches, homeless shelters, counselors, treatment centers, attorneys, correctional facilities, and family members or guardians. During the year, seventeen women resided at the perry center, with an average length of stay of approximately 116 days. The perry center provided 440 hours of educational programming, including parenting, nutrition, decision-making, and life skills development. These classes were attended not only by residential clients but also by women from the surrounding community. In addition, the perry center expanded access to support by offering online educational courses for expecting mothers who did not require residential services but desired guidance and resources during pregnancy. Beyond the residential program, the perry center served 103 families in the fargo-moorhead community by providing essential items such as diapers, baby wipes, and other infant care supplies at no cost. The organization also experienced continued growth in volunteer engagement, supported by 75 general volunteers and 15 mentor moms and families who provided relational support and encouragement to residents. Tender hearts daycare, a program of the perry center established in 2013, provides a safe, nurturing, and christ-centered environment for children, with an emphasis on early development and spiritual formation. In 2025, the program served 27 children. In addition to serving the broader community, tender hearts daycare supports maternity home residents by offering reliable childcare and creating employment opportunities for qualifying residents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.9%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $134.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54.6%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.77; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.6%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.9% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $999K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $163K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.