The PD Collab
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881453442
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Stoneham, MA, USA
- Phone
- 7819440768
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $132,815
- Expenses
- $88,844
- Assets
- $121,446
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jenn Judkins (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Jenn Judkins (Executive Director)
- Karen Ellis (Finance Coordinator)
- Mark Bedrosian (Executive Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary purpose of the organization is to provide PK-12 educators and staff with low-cost, high quality professional development through the exchange of information, ideas, and skills to enhance the professional practice. Member schools and districts pay an annual membership fee which enables any of their staff to attend our 2- or 5-hour workshops for free and longer 10- or 15-hour sessions at a reduced cost.
What it reported doing in 2022
The PD Collab offered 88 high quality, low cost, accessible professional development (PD) workshops ranging from 2 hours to 15 hours each (for a total of 692 hours) to PK-12 teachers and educational staff. A total of 2579 participants were enrolled and completed the PD workshops this fiscal year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.