The Paul Robeson House of Princeton

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460587094
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Princeton, NJ, USA
Phone
(609) 375-8743
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Neighborhood Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$214,641
Expenses
$222,796
Assets
$194,113
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BENJAMIN J COLBERT (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RANDOLPH WIGGINS (EXECUTIVE DI): $52,884 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Paul Robeson House of Princeton's mission is to preserve and activate the legacy of Paul Robeson through educational programs, community events, and the restoration of his childhood home.

What it reported doing in 2025

The board continues to move forward with the renovation of the paul robeson birthplace. We completed more exterior work, including the front and rear entrances, the lower gallery entrance, the driveway, gutters, siding, and roofing. The access ramps and porch railings were completed. As we enter our final phase, the interior is our focus. This includes the electrical wiring, plumbing, communications, mechanical and technical systems, painting, and flooring. We plan a phased opening when building codes and other regulations are completed. A major fundraising campaign is underway to complete this important phase of the restoration. The campaign has focused on individual donors and organizations, providing naming opportunities. In 2025, we were pleased to receive significant grants from both New Jersey and national foundations. The bunbury fund of the princeton area community foundation awarded the paul robeson house of princeton a "sunset grant" in recognition of our impact on the princeton community. We also received a generous gift from the princeton cemetery fund of nassau presbyterian church. The mellon foundation grant ended well with our submission of a final report in april. The 2025 end-of-year fundraising campaign included a series of personal video appeals from board members delivered through our social media channels. Our fundraising communication (link) provides more information about the naming project and other development efforts underway. We are very proud of the growth and development of the robeson scholars and robeson fellows programs, now in its 5th year. This year, 69 students ranging from high school age to law school submitted applications. We selected fourteen students for the class of 2025 (cohort v). Scholars and fellows are engaged in robeson-inspired projects. The program was recognized with an unsolicited grant from first baptist church of somerville, New Jersey. In keeping with our mission to make robeson a household name, we worked with New Jersey senators shirley turner and andrew zwicker to designate april 9th as paul robeson day in New Jersey. The princeton and larger mercer county community supports the dr. Martin luther king jr. Teach-in and curriculum exchange, the installation of the paul robeson mural at the princeton middle school, and our paul robeson day events, including an annual memorial wreath ceremony at the arts council of princeton. In 2025, we participated with the mercer county division of travel and tourism heritage committee - princeton and mercer county nonprofit organizations engaged in planning for the 250th anniversary of our nation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.3%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 53.3%; rating input score 53
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.8%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.7%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -22.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 55.3% of revenue deployed · 53.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $119K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $53K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.