The Patrick Beauregard Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871763459
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Lowell, MA, USA
Phone
9788667580
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$71,087
Expenses
$56,071
Assets
$582,178
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMANDA BEAUREGARD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • AMANDA BEAUREGARD (PRESIDENT)
  • MELISSA BEAUREGARD (DIRECTOR)
  • JOHN HENNESSEY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The patrick beauregard foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to beating colorectal cancer, particularly among young adults under the age of 50.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our goal is to lead by patricks example and provide young adults and their families with a roadmap of hope from discovery to recovery through education, advocacy, and collaboration. Specifically, the foundations guiding principles are n.o.a.h., named after patricks son: knowledge educate and raise public awareness around the startling trends in young-onset colorectal cancer, common symptoms, and treatment options available. Organization provide a nexus between individuals and groups across the spectrum including patients, caregivers, families, doctors and researchers, policymakers, and other advocates that allows for collaborative aggregation of resources and innovative research focused on young-onset colorectal cancer. Advocacy engage legislative and policy decision-makers to prioritize young-onset colorectal cancer research funding and accelerate prevention efforts for young adults. Hope be a source of support and hope for those impacted by young-onset colorectal cancer.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.8%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 93.6%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.1%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.38; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -45.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 42.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 69.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.8% of revenue deployed · 93.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.