The Pathway School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232586474
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Jeffersonville, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6102770660
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,485,289
- Expenses
- $15,276,465
- Assets
- $3,697,931
- Liabilities
- $2,366,142
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID J SCHULTHEIS (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID J SCHULTHEIS (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $258,286 total reported compensation
- LORETTA BOBB (ASSISTANT TREASURER): $172,642 total reported compensation
- BRIAN TRUSTY (COO): $151,237 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To build academic, social and life skills in students with special needs to promote their success and independence after pathway.
What it reported doing in 2024
The pathway school employs an integrated, team approach for the education of children ages 4-21 with mild to moderate autism spectrum disorders, intellectual disabilities, serious emotional disturbance and other neurological impairments. Education is provided on an individualized basis in accordance with each student's individualized education plan (iep) and is designed to meet their academic, social/emotional, and behavioral needs. Services are implemented on a 12- acre campus and in the local community. Additional related services provided include: speech and language therapy, occupational therapy, reading support, adaptive physical education, community reintegration and post-graduation planning, career education and clinical services. Pathway implements a school-wide positive behavior support program that enhances the school environment and provides a safe, therapeutic environment for each student to progress academically and to develop age appropriate social and behavioral skills. The goal of the pathway school is to provide a comprehensive learning environment that empowers each student to learn and achieve their full potential. Pathway students come from 40 school districts, 20 charter schools and from 8 southeastern Pennsylvania counties. The pathway school currently serves 173 students from intermediate units 14, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 29.the instructional model used at the pathway school ranges from a self-contained, one-on-one instruction; to homogeneous groupings for reading, math, science and writing instruction; to departmentalized instruction in a secondary (high school) program. Staffing ratios depend on the needs of each student, but generally class size is 6 - 8 students, with 1 teacher and 1 teacher assistant. Each classroom is equipped with computer and smartboard technology and each student has their own chromebook tablet. Pathway continues to expand the use of technology and has stem programing which is being used by students. The instructional curriculum with scope and sequence includes the use of research-based instructional practices and is designed to meet state common core standards. All teachers are certified by the Pennsylvania department of education; most hold master degrees. Social skills are embedded throughout the school day so students can learn to interact appropriately with peers and adults across a variety of settings. Regardless of intellectual functioning, every pathway student over the age of 14 is eligible to work in the career education program, which includes both on-campus and community-based employment experiences. All pathway students are encouraged to participate in the theater program where they are led by professional actors and set designers on the production of the school plays. Pathway students graduate at a rate of 100%. High achieving students are able to attend classes at montgomery county community college while enrolled at pathway.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.5%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.5% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $258K · 24 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $376K reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.