The Partnership to End Homelessness Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133732698
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2126453444
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Homeless Shelters

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,349,546
Expenses
$2,611,572
Assets
$2,953,236
Liabilities
$574,373

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANN DUGGAN (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANN DUGGAN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $285,189 total reported compensation
  • LISA TOMANELLI (CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER): $179,729 total reported compensation
  • ANNETTE R TERRIZZI (DIRECTOR OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS): $138,288 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The partnership to end homelessness' values - compassion, inclusion, integrity, professionalism and social justice - steer our strategy, decision-making and operations as we work to achieve our mission of ending homelessness by preventing it.

What it reported doing in 2024

Housing assistance and crisis assistance: our save homes rental arrears assistance program and safe homes rapid rehousing program address crises and provide intensive casework to keep new yorkers permanently housed. Save homes: our rental arrears assistance program is a full grant payment (no loans) that is accessible to immigrants and citizens, regardless of employment status. (see schedule o for more information)we provide rental assistance as a first step to keeping new yorkers safely housed while we provide them with ongoing support to secure and/or improve their income. This work includes nyc one shot deal navigation and related advocacy for all eligible families; landlord negotiations and mediation to secure rent and arrears discounts, new leases, repairs and timely payments; and, collaborations with legal services partners to ensure legal representation for clients. Safe homes: our rapid rehousing program serves clients who are experiencing domestic and gender-based violence that prevents them from remaining in their current homes. We work with new yorkers impacted by violence to find new safe homes and provide guaranteed rent and supportive services for up to two years to ensure housing and health stability. Services include landlords and broker relations; housing searches and housing quality standards (hqs) inspections; rent reasonableness assessments; lease negotiations; financial assistance for qualifying moving and utility costs; and, the development of individual rapid rehousing manuals that explain lease terms, tenant rights and responsibilities and the rental assistance breakdown plan. In tandem with these interventions, we stabilize families by providing crisis intervention services and casework to give clients access to government benefits, education access, financial empowerment, emergency food programs, childcare, small cash grants, assistance via our on-site pantry and other emergency services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.9%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 82.9%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.9% of revenue deployed · 82.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $285K · 13 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $307K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.