The Partnership for Families & Children
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841173226
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3038378466
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,008,492
- Expenses
- $1,230,647
- Assets
- $2,491,521
- Liabilities
- $1,923,913
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific purpose of the corporation is to improve efficiency and effectiveness of education, health, and human services for the people of the state of Colorado. The corporation shall undertake activities which encourage collaboration; identify and develop best practices in education, health, and human services; and initiate planning, adoption and implementation of these practices throughout the state of Colorado.
What it reported doing in 2010
Adams county safe schools/healthy school initiative is an integrated community wide approach to create and sustain safe, respectful, drug-free schools, increase high school graduation rates, and promote pro-social skills and healthy family and childhood development.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.02; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -19.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $902K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $95K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.