The Partnership for a Healthier Carroll County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522156892
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
- Location
- Westminster, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4108716784
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $250,996
- Expenses
- $318,752
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOROTHY FOX (DIRECTOR/EXECUTIVE DIR./PRESIDENT)
- GARRETT W HOOVER (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT CHC/COO OF CHC)
Highest reported compensation
- GARRETT W HOOVER (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT CHC/COO OF CHC): $965,488 total reported compensation
- SHARON L MCCLERNAN (DIR./VP OF CLINICAL INTEGRATION, CHC): $373,166 total reported compensation
- DOROTHY FOX (DIRECTOR/EXECUTIVE DIR./PRESIDENT): $145,117 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The partnership strives to mobilize the citizens, organizations, and resources of carroll county, Maryland in a collaborative effort to promote and sustain good health in the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The partnership for a healthier carroll county, an affiliate of carroll hospital center and the carroll county health department, is a non-profit organization working to improve health by connecting people, inspiring action, and strengthening community. Our organization is the coordinating hub that connects agencies and individuals in pursuit of a healthier community. As a non-profit organization we work to promote healthy lifestyles, inspire leadership, track emerging health issues, influence policies that impacts health, oversee community health assessments and monitor health data to regularly check the pulse of our community. The partnership supports several initiatives throughout the community. Those programs include walk carroll, nobody is perfect and the mental health speaker series. Walk carroll: the walk carroll programming was successfully expanded to include a number of projects outside of the traditional walking clubs in order to reach more community members and support new ideas for increasing physical activity. In partnership with carroll county recreation and parks, a few new programs were added: first day hike, paddle with the partnership, and the 100 mile challenge. Nobody is perfect: the partnership presented a program entitled nobody is perfect focused on targeting families. Nutrition, social media and physical activity were the themes to address how parents talk to themselves about body image, and the ripple effect. From these sessions we expanded and included more on social media and healthy screen time and their effects on body image and mental health. These sessions were held on specific topics at carroll county public schools and carroll community college. Mental health speaker series: the partnership was able to provide monthly speaker sessions to therapists and social workers offering them free ceu's for their license. Community members were also able to attend at no cost. The mhss was composed of experts in different topics surrounding mental health needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 73
- Sustainability: 6
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.9%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 59.8%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 39.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.9% of revenue deployed · 59.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $191K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $965K · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 51 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.