The Parents' Campaign
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 651272287
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Jackson, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6019614551
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,823
- Expenses
- $116,840
- Assets
- $233,692
- Liabilities
- $121,686
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- NANCY LOOME (SEC/TREAS/EXEC DIRECTOR): $101,218 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The parents' campaign (tpc) seeks to ensure a brighter future for Mississippi children by promoting better public schools through parent advocacy. Tpc informs the public of legislation that affects schools, facilitates communication with legislators, (continued on schedule o) and reports to parents and the public how legislators vote on bills that determine the level of education offered their children. By giving parents a means by which their voices can be heard, tpc is working to change Mississippi for the better.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024-2025, the parents' campaign (tpc) focused on engaging the public in the legislative process, with the goal of moving forward policies that improve Mississippi's public schools. Communication & outreach: to further its goal of strengthening the state's public education system, tpc worked cooperatively with various parent groups, school districts, education organizations, and business and civic groups statewide. - continued on schedule otpc continued to grow its membership and social media presence. Throughout the year, tpc provided regular email and social media updates to inform members of state and federal legislation and policy issues affecting public education in Mississippi. Public engagement & information: tpc continued to expand and add resources to its website (msparentscampaign.org). The site allows tpc members and the public to access all features at no cost. Visitors to the site can perform a range of tasks, including identifying state legislators and members of the u.s. Congress who represent each school district and easily obtaining contact information for each representative or senator, and viewing information specific to the school district, such as funding statistics and accountability ratings. Tpc's online resources include a searchable archive of voting records for current and former legislators. Legislators' current votes on key bills are shared regularly via social media and member emails during each legislative session. Visitors to tpc's website also can find, by school district, contact information for statewide, regional, and local media outlets and appropriate contact information for submitting opinion pieces and letters to the editor, as well as tips for doing so successfully.tpc engaged members and the public through meetings with parents and educators, regular updates for key volunteers, and by communications via network emails and social media campaigns promoting the importance of fully funding public schools, paying teachers a professional salary, preserving state revenue, rejecting the diversion of public funds to private schools, and investing in pre-k and other supports and services to benefit Mississippi children. There is no cost for membership or for any service provided by tpc.legislative action: during the 2025 regular and special sessions of the Mississippi legislature, tpc tracked state policy decisions and lawmakers' actions by attending weekly meetings of key legislative committees and monitoring Mississippi house and senate floor debates and votes. Lawmakers' votes were reported by tpc via the tools described in previous sections of this report.members of the parents' campaign influenced legislative action by calling, texting, and emailing their representatives and senators, posting on social media, organizing meetings, and recruiting other concerned citizens to join their efforts. Tpc staff met regularly with legislative leaders to express public school priorities and coordinated legislative advocacy initiatives with other education advocacy organizations.tpc's successes in the 2025 regular and special sessions of the Mississippi legislature included:- full funding of public schools- $3.5-million appropriation for the Mississippi teacher residency program- level funding for pre-k- defeat of multiple school choice measures- defeat of repeated efforts to divert additional state revenue to private schools (with no accountability and no oversight) via tax credits that deplete the state funding available to public schools
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 71.1%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.9% of revenue deployed · 71.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $83K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.