The Parent-faculty Association of Franklin Elementary School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251811099
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Sewickley, PA, USA
Phone
4126085870
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$167,049
Expenses
$156,117
Assets
$70,516
Liabilities
$3,055

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAMANTHA CARUTHERS (PRESIDENT)
  • JANET SIDOR (PRESIDENT)
  • KIRA POSTERARO (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SAMANTHA CARUTHERS (PRESIDENT)
  • JANET SIDOR (PRESIDENT)
  • KIRA POSTERARO (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose of the parent-faculty association of franklin elementary school is to organize and direct a variety of academic activities throughout the school year in order to promote education, welfare and well-being of the students of the franklin elementary school and to promote understanding and cooperation between the parents, facilty, education support staff, administration and general public welfare of and related to the franklin elementary school.

What it reported doing in 2024

Assemblies and after-school programs; the parent - faculty association of franklin elementary school provides the funding for educational school assemblies and after-school educational programs. These focus on all facets of the childrens' educational experiences including the arts, "hands on" science presentations, diversity and music. All programs are reviewed and approved by the school administration to insure their educational integrity for each grade level as well as their intergration with the school criteria.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.7% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.