The Original Six Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453709610
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Columbia, SC, USA
Phone
8032449511
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,473,260
Expenses
$1,082,820
Assets
$2,278,829
Liabilities
$53,868

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KARA MEADOR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KARA MEADOR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $140,000 total reported compensation
  • NICHOLAS A WASHINGTON (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $120,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The original six foundation believes a student's educational opportunities should not be limited by the zip code in which he or she lives. Our mission is to break down barriers through after-school programming and early literacy initiatives in rural and underserved communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

The original six (o6) foundation's flagship program, o6 afterschool, provides students in grades two through eight with a safe and supportive place to learn while closing academic gaps. What began as a small pilot program has grown significantly over the last decade. Currently in its 10th year, o6 afterschool is a model of impact and consistency. During the 2024-25 school year, o6 afterschool: -served nearly 1,000 students in 12 public schools located in eight counties (allendale, bamberg, clarendon, colleton, florence, greenville, marion, and union). -delivered 16,998 hour of individualized homework assistance provided by more than 120 certified teachers. -97% of parents reported the program positively impacted their child, and 92% of students said they understood schoolwork better after attending. In the fall of 2025, o6 afterschool expanded to a 13th school, sims middle school and extended programming for eighth-grade students at jonesville elementary school, both in union county.students receive not only academic support but also opportunities to explore career pathways. In recent years, o6 has: -supplied virtual reality headsets for career exploration in rural schools. -partnered with companies like honda, boeing, bca bicycle, and haynesworth, sinkler, boyd to offer elementary and middle school students career exploration excursions. We also have onsite career experts who speak to students at school. -we are making it a priority to get the students we serve on university, college, and technical school campuses. Interactive steam (science, technology, engineering, arts, and math) learning, team activities, and social enrichment remain a prominent piece of the program, helping students build confidence, develop strong study habits, and cultivate a lasting love of learning. All o6 programs operate. At no cost for students and families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.5%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $49.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 56.2%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.5% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $140K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.