The Oregon Chapter of the Fellows of the American College of Surgeons

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
936090977
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Salem, OR, USA
Phone
5033717457
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,530
Expenses
$19,161
Assets
$23,539
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SANDEEP KUMAR MD (PRESIDENT)
  • PHILIPPA NEWELL MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • BERT STEWART MD (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SANDEEP KUMAR MD (PRESIDENT)
  • PHILIPPA NEWELL MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • ANTHONY GUITIERREZ BS (COUNCILOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To uphold the mission of the american college of surgeons: "dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safe guarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment."to provide opportunities for mentoring between surgeons and surgical residents.to foster fellowship among the surgeons of Oregon.to enhance the educational opportunities of members with an annual interactive scientific forum of original basic and clinical research and visiting surgical experts.to uphold the highest standards of patient care. When appropriate the chapter will cooperate with other local and state medical societies and worthy civic groups to achieve this aim. To promote dialogue and help frame discussion for unresolved and/or controversial clinical and socio-economic issues confronting our membership.

What it reported doing in 2024

The purpose of this organization is to improve the care of surgical patients and safeguard standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment. This is accomplished through providing support for members and hosting meetings for members to provide cutting edge education in the surgical specialties.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50.3%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.