The Olana Partnership

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
141828430
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Hudson, NY, USA
Phone
5188281872
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,001,008
Expenses
$3,952,160
Assets
$17,501,869
Liabilities
$1,758,199

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

31 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SEAN SAWYER (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SEAN SAWYER (PRESIDENT): $202,008 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire the public by preserving and interpreting olana, frederic church's artistic masterpiece.

What it reported doing in 2025

Collections / exhibitions: top's curatorial department continued work to implement an ambitious exhibition, publication, and a suite of national museum activations that will take place in 2026 in support of the church 200 initiative, the bicentennial of frederic church's birth. Led by dr. Elizabeth kornhauser, curator emerita of the american wing at the metropolitan museum of art, and senior consulting curator for the olana partnership, the initiative will feature over 50 institutions across the globe planning exhibitions and installations placing church's work and legacy in a new light. Art. The top team facilitated several loans from the olana collection to external exhibitions organized in recognition of church 200, including those at the metropolitan museum of art, the albany institute of history and art, and middlebury college museum of art. The exhibition frederic church: global artist, to open may 2026 at olana state historic site, is curated by dr. Kornhauser with co-curators dr. Timothy barringer, and dr. Jennifer raab, and is accompanied by a publication from yale university press, featuring contributions from 14 emerging and underrepresented voices in the field of american art. Top will also release another new publication in 2026 titled olana: frederic church's vision of landscape and art with rizzoli electa, with research and editorial support from the curatorial team. Beginning june 2025 top presented the exhibition what's missing? Artworks in the olana landscape, featuring site-specific outdoor art installations by ellen harvey and gabriela salazar. Both artists developed installation projects that responded to "missing" elements of the olana landscape, with salazar's 2-part sculpture situated in olana's historic farm complex, and harvey's interactive "summer house" located on a site near the main house where a similar historic structure is thought to have stood. Both artworks will remain on view at olana through october 2026. Top also continued to offer a collections-based programmatic series a closer look, aimed at fostering conversational "close looking" sessions centered around underseen artworks from the olana collection. In june 2025 a dedicated digitization specialist was hired to begin a 2-year contract digitizing and creating an online catalogue of works by frederic church in the olana collection. This exciting project is ongoing and anticipated to begin rollout in 2026 and is supported by a $300,000 grant from the henry luce foundation. Other ongoing collection-focused projects are underway, with top receiving a $15,000 grant from the cynthia woods mitchell fund for historic interiors awarded by the national trust for historic preservation to support interpretive lighting improvements to olana's historic house interiors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.6%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 66.8%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.43; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.6% of revenue deployed · 66.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 30 of 30 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $2.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $202K · 31 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.