The Northeast Health Group Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 043273530
IRS 990 coverage: 2011–2020
Forms available: Form 990 2020
Location: Bala Cynwyd, PA, USA
Phone: 2153466454
Rating: 68
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Nursing, Convalescent Facilities

Reported finances

Revenue: $42,545,459
Expenses: $42,356,519
Assets: $25,206,432
Liabilities: $23,819,290

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

HOWARD JAFFE (PRESIDENT (END 12/2020))
ANN MULLEN DEL COLLO (PRESIDENT (BEG 12/2020))

Highest reported compensation

DIANNE DOUGLAS (LICENSED PRACTICAL NURSE): $208,311 total reported compensation
DENNIS BILLINGS (ADMINISTRATOR): $202,525 total reported compensation
BOUBACAR KOMOU (REGISTERED NURSE): $167,058 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The northeast health group, inc.'s mission includes operation of one or more nursing homes, provision of housing for the elderly, development of medical programs for the care of the elderly and education of healthcare personnel in proper care of the elderly.

What it reported doing in 2020

The organization operates skilled nursing facilities, with a capacity of 448 beds, dedicated and committed to providing rehabilitation and short- and long-term nursing and medical care of patients and residents. The organization provides numerous activities and programs incorporating and promoting family activities and involvement with residents and staff. These activities promote a normalized environment. During the current year, there were 65,875 resident days.

Operating model

Revenue model: Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 77
Transparency & Controls: 79
Accountability: 42
Sustainability: 27
Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.94; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $36.7M in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $208K · 10 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $14.1M reported
Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2020
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.