The Next Door Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930600421
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hood River, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5413866665
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Prison Alternatives
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,642,548
- Expenses
- $10,931,203
- Assets
- $7,602,722
- Liabilities
- $1,149,566
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANET HAMADA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JANET HAMADA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $181,497 total reported compensation
- MELANIE KELLY (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $141,192 total reported compensation
- BRYAN KELLEY (CONTROLLER): $93,492 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The next door, inc. Is dedicated to opening doors to new possibilities by strengthening children and families and improving communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Health promotion services - also known as nuestra comunidad sana (our healthy community), health promotion services offers culturally appropriate health promotion and disease prevention services and leadership development to the latino community in the columbia gorge. Programs include mid-columbia health equity advocates ("mchea"); heath promotion and chronic disease prevention ("hpcdp"); valle verde; advance directives ("ad"); drug free communities ("dfc") odell hispanic coalition; hombres auto responsables para parar el abuso ("hapa"); msfw outreach; equity corps of Oregon; voter mobilization project, children in between, and the columbia gorge pride alliance.continued on schedule o. Mchea's goal is to train members of the latino and native american communities for leadership roles throughout hood river and wasco counties to help support their community involvement. Hpcdp, based on mchea groups, helps make environmental, systems, and policy changes related to tobacco reduction, healthy and nutritious foods, and exercise in the community.valle verde is a mental and emotional health promotion program for community health workers and community members to increase awareness and decrease stigma in the latino community regarding topics of emotional wellness. Advance directive is an outreach campaign to raise awareness of spanish and english communities in the gorge of the importance of having an advance directive.dfc odell hispanic coalition is a leadership and drug prevention promotion coalition in the latino community. Tndi acts as fiscal agent for this independent community coalition. The hombres autoresponsables para parar el abuso (hapa) program is domestic violence treatment for spanish-speaking perpetrators in hood river and the dalles. Msfw outreach is the coordination of efforts across the gorge to address the needs of migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Equity corps of Oregon is a partnership with the Oregon workers relief fund and innovation law lab that helps find legal resources for individuals. Voter mobilization project helps promote the importance of civic engagement of latinos across the region. Children in between provides court ordered classes for parents who are divorcing to remind them about their children.columbia gorge pride alliance provides a safe environment for lgbtqia2s+ in the gorge. From hosting pride parades in hood river and the dalles, to youth outreach, community partnerships, networking and educational opportunities, and more, the pride alliance aims to bring together the lgbtqia2s+ community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 83.1%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 83.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $181K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.