The Never Alone Clubhouse Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862853583
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Douglasville, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7704851294
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $593,502
- Expenses
- $543,524
- Assets
- $1,236,796
- Liabilities
- $1,110,611
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jocelyn Wallace (Executive Director and Board Member)
- Deena Davis (Vice President and Board Director)
- Jamie Dapremont (President and Board Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Jocelyn Wallace (Executive Director and Board Member): $77,711 total reported compensation
- Janis Austin (Secretary and Board Director): $13,147 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
NAC is a recovery community organization RCO. As an RCO our organization organizes recovery focused policy advocacy activities carries out recovery focused community education and outreach programs and provides peer-based recovery support services RCC. Our broadly defined recovery community is people based in long-term recovery their families friends and allies and the recovery focused addiction and recovery professionals. NAC presents and reflects religious spiritual and secular pathways. Our sole mission as an RCO is to mobilize resources within and outside of the recovery community to increase the prevalence and quality of long-term recovery from alcohol and drug addiction. Public education policy advocacy and peer-based recovery support services are the strategies through which our mission is achieved.
What it reported doing in 2024
As an RCO our organization organizes recovery focused policy advocacy activities carries out recovery focused community education and outreach programs and provides peer-based recovery support services RCC. Public education policy advocacy and peer-based recovery support services are the strategies through which our mission is achieved. NAC also provides pre and post booking RCO peer support recovery services to individuals who have faced criminal charges with the Douglas County Georgia criminal court system. Our broadly defined recovery community is people based in long-term recovery their families friends and allies and the recovery focused addiction and recovery professionals. NAC presents and reflects religious spiritual and secular pathways.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 90% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.5%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.28; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.9; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 54.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 74% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.5% of revenue deployed · 79.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $544K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $78K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 38 of 41 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX OfficeExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.