The National Shrine of St Frances Xavier Cabrini Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455607401
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7733605115
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $590,335
- Expenses
- $1,207,928
- Assets
- $1,914,675
- Liabilities
- $116,102
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sr Joaquina Costa MSC (President of the National Shrine)
- Laurie A Halaska (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Laurie A Halaska (Executive Director): $100,166 total reported compensation
- Stephen Ruff (General Counsel to the National Shrine): $6,418 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Performance of religious, benevolent, charitable and educational activities
What it reported doing in 2025
1. Hiring of two key staff: Rector - Bishop Daniel Turley, OSA & Ministry Program Director - Ed Shuttleworth. Both of these hires were critical to the growth and marketing of our programs. Bishop Turley has brought new groups into our Shrine from Italy, Chicago parishes that were not aware of our Shrine along with sharing information about our space for retreats. In 2025, Ed Shuttleworth spent his initial months personally visiting schools and parishes throughout the Chicagoland Archdiocese, again, bringing the same awareness that Bishop Turley did. 2. Added new community focused events/programs geared toward families and young people: A. In July, 2025, we hosted a community family birthday party to celebrate Mother Cabrinis 175th birthday. This event included animated movie, crafts for children, coloring and many other family friendly events. B. As mentioned above, the two new staff roles raised awareness so we were able to offer retreat space (at no cost) to Religious Education Confirmation groups who are required to host two retreats prior to actual confirmation. We had three parishes accept this opportunity in 2025. C. We also offered our first Hispanic Mass when we partnered with St Mary of the Lake for Three Kings Day. Their elementary school came and provided music and traditional dancing during this Feast Day event. 3. Launched new website in November, 2025. A. The new site clearly lays out all of our special events for the entire year. All events, Masses, etc are on our new calendar months in advance with links to register and to receive detailed information. B. An intricate form on the new site is for all tours. Its a simple yet direct form that provides the Shrine with all pertinent information for a pilgrimage request. This has streamlined communication immensely. 4. Defined partnerships with outside agencies. A. In 2025, we clearly identified six outside non-profits to partner with for the entire year. This allowed us to clearly communicate to our Shrines attendees the Mission of each of these groups along with any needs those groups had.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.6%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 38.1%; rating input score 38
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -104.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.6% of revenue deployed · 38.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $460K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.