The National Native American Boarding Sc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383888458
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6123547700
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cultural, Ethnic Awareness
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,979,586
- Expenses
- $4,785,365
- Assets
- $5,057,250
- Liabilities
- $319,652
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RAMONA KLEIN (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHIEF BENJAMIN BARNES (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES LABELLE (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- DEBORAH PARKER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- SAMUEL TORRES (DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- DEBORAH PARKER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $206,992 total reported compensation
- SAMUEL TORRES (DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $161,766 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To lead in the pursuit of understanding and addressing the ongoing trauma created by the u.s. Indian boarding school policy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Healing - nabs work is unique in that it is anchored in traditional indigenous ways of knowing and being, while complemented with contemporary resources to assist native peoples to heal from intergenerational trauma. Every aspect of the process has been developed to honor and respect all participants, foster collaboration at multiple levels, centrally position reciprocity, and to cultivate kinship relationships. Online virtual healing circles were held monthly facilitated by one member of the healing team along with two native licensed therapists. An average of 20 boarding school survivors from various tribal nations across the u.s. Participated in the virtual circles. The feedback from participants has been that they want to keep the circle going because it has helped them to feel connected, understood and hopeful. Nabs established healing informed resources for self-care & trauma now available on the website and shared with participants.this year also focused on developing more safe spaces for boarding school survivors and descendants to explore culture and artistic expression. With the support from the national endowment for the arts (nea), the healing team was able to work closely with 5 master native artists to teach traditional art forms. The team successfully implemented online classes focusing on moccasin making and healing through song, with a total of 45 participants thus far. This project is guided by the wisdom of 5 health ambassadors: dedicated advocates for the healing power of the arts in our communities. Nabs has learned from boarding school survivors and descendants that receiving a care package filled with culturally relevant and useful indigenous-made products enhances wellbeing, reduces isolation, and increases community connectedness. Care packages to support on-going healing were sent to 216 elders this year, including the survivors who were interviewed for the oral history project.with the continued support of northwest indian college offering nabs space at no cost for a healing site in tulalip, Washington, nabs has developed a plan to strengthen healing opportunities for boarding school survivors and descendants, offering safe, consistent, and culturally grounded services at this location. Two staff currently maintain the nw healing center, and we expect to have a full offering of healing support three days a week by mid-2026.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $207K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $357K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.