The National Museum of Women in the Arts

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521238810
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2027835000
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,143,812
Expenses
$16,862,812
Assets
$191,643,349
Liabilities
$30,314,538

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

45 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN GOLDBERG (PRESIDENT)
  • SUSAN FISHER STERLING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ALICE WEST DIR.))

Highest reported compensation

  • SUSAN FISHER STERLING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ALICE WEST DIR.)): $425,740 total reported compensation
  • KATHRYN WAT (DEPUTY DIR., ART, PROG. & PUBLIC ENG.): $237,750 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTINA KNOWLES (DIR. OF DEV., ANNUAL GIVING & MEMBER): $200,845 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the national museum of women in the arts is to collect, conserve and elevate the achievements of women artists from all nationalities and to educate the public on their outstanding accomplishments. We strive to accomplish our mission by national and international outreach programs dedicated to provide an opportunity for all to join us in the recognition of women artists, motivate children and adults alike in the pursuit of a deeper understanding of the obstacles and accomplishments of women artists. With the museum's outstanding educational programs, in-house library, magazine, member benefits and exceptional exhibitions, we are able to promote and educate the public on the accomplishments of women artists and allow for the growth and future opportunity for aspiring women artists so that they too may realize their dreams.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education & public programs: year at a glance: - more than 6,000 people attended thirty public programs featuring fifty artists and cultural innovators. - 237 teachers from seventeen states, Washington, d.c., and five countries participated in the fifth annual virtual educator summer camp and the on-site art, books, and creativity teacher institute. Where art meets audience after a visit in march, a girl scout troop leader wrote, "we had a fabulous time exploring the art and such interesting discussions about why there aren't more women artists represented in art museums. Thank you again for a fantastic morning!" thousands of nmwa visitors had similar experiences: positive, creative, and thought-provoking. Visitors of all ages enjoyed tours, talks, and art-making opportunities during nmwa's popular, twice-monthly free community days: - more than 13,000 people attended the museum's free community days. - sunday free community days engaged an average of 828 attendees per day. - the busiest free community days occurred during women's history month: 512 people visited on wednesday, march 12, and 1,124 on sunday, march 1. In the susan swartz studio, the open studio series engaged free community day visitors with drop-in art-making. Across twenty-three sessions, more than 2,600 participants created self-portrait books, custom buttons, zines, mini tapestries, pocket-size star books, beaded pins, an alma woodsey thomas-inspired tape collage, and an alison saar-inspired paper etching.nmwa offered opportunities for visitors to learn directly from artists with hands-on firsthand experience workshops. Across five workshops taught by local artists, eighty-eight participants learned how to make pop-up books, prints, plant portraits (in collaboration with the u.s. Botanic garden), cyanotypes, and even hula hoops. Across the city, nmwa educators brought the museum's art and exhibitions to life through visits to eleven local schools and universities. They led art-making activities and facilitated conversations inspired by the museum's collection that engaged nearly 500 students. In addition: - seventy-three schools and youth groups visited the museum for tours that served more than 2,300 students and chaperones. - more than 3,500 people attended private tours and drop-in collection highlights tours. - fourteen teachers participated in the eleventh on-site art, books, and creativity teacher institute, the first since the museum's reopening in 2023. - 5,300 visitors enjoyed educational "see for yourself" cards about art in the collection and exhibitions. The women, arts, and social change (wasc) public programming initiative shared the transformative power of women and the arts as agents of social change through diverse and inspiring events. Wasc events engaged more than 6,200 attendees across twenty-five programs, a 61.5% increase from the previous fiscal year. The museum's signature fresh talk series returned with five events that dove into exhibition themes and timely social issues. In one event, artist suchitra mattai and writer aruna d'souza discussed mattai's work to challenge conventional colonialist narratives. In another, hunter harris and peyton dix, writers and podcast hosts, examined the portrayal of women in media, film, and literature. Nmwa programs offered even more opportunities to hear from leading artists and curators. Sandra jackson-dumont, recent former director of the lucas museum of narrative art, spoke during women's history month. A virtual talk on international women's day featured artists fabiola jean-louis and sheida soleimani, both part of the exhibition uncanny. For world pride, photographer zanele muhloi and scholar mecca jamilah sullivan celebrated the latest volume of muholi's powerful self-portrait series. The nmwa nights late-hours series returned with eight vibrant, sold-out events. Each themed evening offered attendees music, art-making, creative cocktails and mocktails, and more. This year, local poets perfor

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.4%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 63.2%; rating input score 63
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -28.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.36; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.4% of revenue deployed · 63.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 35 of 35 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $10.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $426K · 45 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2M reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.