The National Board of Examiners in Optometry Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460238342
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Charlotte, NC, USA
Phone
7043329565
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,842,316
Expenses
$9,564,059
Assets
$17,040,918
Liabilities
$5,161,542

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL OHLSON OD (PRESIDENT)
  • KARLA ZADNIK OD PHD (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JIM CAMPBELL OD (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • STACY JILL BRYANT OD MPH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • STACY JILL BRYANT OD MPH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $306,086 total reported compensation
  • NICOLE L JERGE OD (SR DIR OF CLINICAL EXAM DEV & ADMIN): $186,278 total reported compensation
  • WHITNEY BOUKNIGHT JD (GENERAL COUNSEL): $171,785 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the national board of examiners in optometry is to protect the public by developing, administering, scoring, and reporting results of valid examinations that assess competency in optometry.

What it reported doing in 2024

The nbeo series of licensure exams consists of three separate parts. Part i applied basic science (abs) is a multiple-choice, computer-based exam that assesses candidates' mastery of the underlying basic science concepts necessary for entry into optometric practice. Part ii patient assessment and management (pam) examination assesses clinical thinking and decision-making, along with knowledge of diagnosis and treatment. The part ii pam exam is also a computer-based, multiple-choice exam. Continued on schedule o.part ii pam questions frequently are shown as part of an overall case wherein candidates are given clinical information, sometimes including diagnostic images. The treatment and management of ocular disease (tmod) examination can be completed as part of part ii pam (embedded within the exam) or may be taken as a standalone examination. Part iii clinical skills exam (cse), which retired at the end of the 2023-2024 administrative year, was a performance-based exam wherein examinees were required to perform optometric clinical skills that reflect practice. These skills were performed at four different stations; all stations relied on standardized patients on whom the examinee performed the skills for each station. Each station was housed within an examination room that was designed to simulate real-life optometric exam rooms. The equipment, placement of materials, and room dimensions were standardized, and the nbeo followed a multilayered protocol for quality assurance throughout the examination process. Beginning in august 2024, nbeo began administering the part iii patient encounters and performance skills (peps) examination. This new, restructured part iii exam is consistent with nbeo's mission of public protection and complements the part i and part ii exams in assessing whether candidates are qualified to enter into the independent practice of optometry. It is the combination of these three exams that represents overall competency and ultimately enables a candidate to demonstrate the optometric knowledge and skills necessary to practice. Part iii peps has been developed to not only evaluate essential skills but also to measure a candidate's ability to apply evidence-based knowledge to patient care. The new exam moves beyond the assessment of the physical ability to perform the skill to also measure a candidate's cognitive ability to interpret the result and apply that knowledge directly to patient care. For information on these licensure exams as well as the additional exams offered by nbeo, please visit the nbeo website at www.optometry.org.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.7%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 69.7%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.2%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.78; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.7% of revenue deployed · 69.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $306K · 15 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.1M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.