The Natiello Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873659148
IRS 990-PF coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025
Location
Coral Gables, FL, USA
Phone
3056656172
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$73,928
Expenses
$3,467

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Human Service Organizations

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 10 grants totaling $604. The stated grant purposes included to formulate and promote public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional american values, and a strong national defense., to proclaim the gospel of jesus christ according to catholic tradition by providing quality education which celebrates our catholic faith and embraces native american cultures, primarily the northern cheyenne and crow tribes, so that native american individuals and communities of southeastern montana are empowered to attain self-sufficiency., and to save and improve human and animal lives through plant based diets and ethical and effective sceintific research., plus 7 other reported purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from contributions.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The foundation combined direct charitable work with grants to other organizations or people.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and the filing identifies who received its grants. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants and a relatively small share of available resources goes to charitable grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 50
  • Cost Efficiency: 17
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: 99

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 50.4%; rating input score 50; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 17.4%; rating input score 17; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Grants to individuals: Pass
    • Grants to organizations: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 9; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 251.35; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: 50.4% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 99th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Grant Deployment: Grant deployment ratio scored 50/100.