The Mounted Posse Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510197273
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Equestrian

Reported finances

Revenue
$150,808
Expenses
$136,520
Assets
$111,622
Liabilities
$4,813

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANNY MICHELSON (President)
  • TREVOR RUSSELL (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • DANNY MICHELSON (President)
  • TREVOR RUSSELL (Vice President)
  • ED WEATHERSBY (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The objectives of this organization is to promote good fellowship and the love of good horses to encourage youth and families to participate in, appreciate and enjoy activities involving horses and traditions relating to western life and to support charitable functions and services of non-profit organizations that benefit equestrian related activities and members of the community and their families.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization hosts multiple events that foster family involvement in equestrian activities and raise funds for community events and non-profit organizations. Funds are raised for the following The Young Ropers Scholarship, to remove financial barriers and allow families to participate in The Family Summer Ride, to provide clothing for homeless individuals and a scholarship to help homeless individuals receive services so they can get back on their feet, to donate food to people in need, to donate blood to individuals in need and to participate in providing, preparing and serving dinner to homeless men to build comradery with people in the community who are working hard to get back on their feet.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.