George Washington's Mount Vernon
Legal name: The Mount Vernon Ladies' Association of the Union
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 540564701
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Mount Vernon, Virginia, USA
- Phone
- (703) 780-2000
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $82,188,334
- Expenses
- $64,241,277
- Assets
- $400,749,510
- Liabilities
- $24,454,006
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
38 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUGLAS BRADBURN (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DOUGLAS BRADBURN (PRESIDENT/CEO): $599,127 total reported compensation
- PHILIP MANNO (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $332,898 total reported compensation
- SUSAN SCHOELWER (EXEC DIR, HPC & SR CURATOR, RHS): $302,317 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To preserve George Washington's home and legacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education: mount vernon continued to provide opportunities to educate teachers and students about the life and legacies of george Washington through expanded public programming and digital resources, with approximately 290,000 students visiting the estate with school groups. The estate underwent significant operational changes in 2024 due to landmark revitalization work in the mansion and the creation of a new state-of-the-art education center. "george Washington: a revolutionary life," reflects updated scholarship on george Washington and the 18th-century world he lived in and is slated to open in july 2026, as america celebrates its 250th anniversary.over the course of six weeks in the summer of 2024, we welcomed 147 teachers from 46 states to mount vernon for our 25th year of in-person professional development experiences. Each week of programming in 2024 provided educators with opportunities to exchange ideas with visiting scholars and with one another, applying these insights to the classroom and impacting nearly 19,000 american students nationwide. Attendees stayed in historic old town alexandria, Virginia, and engaged with partner history and civics institutions in the d.c. Metro area to foster professional development and networking opportunities. Other teacher-specific programming, ranging from steam workshops to state and national education conference sessions, allowed mount vernon to reach more than 550 additional teachers. Over 5,000 students benefited from digital and in-person programs at the george Washington presidential library, including onsite leadership simulation programs. Nearly 500 visitors attended mount vernon through our partnership with tickets for kids, a nonprofit organization that provides ticket donations to low-income families. We also continue our participation in the museums for all initiative, sponsored by the institute of museum and library services, which offers significantly reduced admissions to those receiving food assistance. Visitors to mount vernon in 2024 engaged with a multitude of daily programs, including discovery carts, exploring george Washington's iconic home; story time programs; family day programs throughout the year; 18th-century foodways demonstrations; and historic trades demonstrations. A series of themed weekend programs, running from july through december, offered an in-depth look at 18th-century topics, ranging from healthcare to tavern culture, animals, and holiday celebrations. Partner organizations, such as colonial williamsburg, the national museum of the american revolution, and the national museum of the united states army, added to the visitor experience with their expertise and programming.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.5%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 92%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.8%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.24; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 83.5% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $53.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $599K · 38 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $11.6M reported
- Consistency: 43 of 45 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.