The More 320 Haven
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851942799
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Anderson, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8036228315
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $149,762
- Expenses
- $97,222
- Assets
- $216,122
- Liabilities
- $58,929
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN SHELTON (PRESIDENT)
- LINDA SHELTON (CEO)
People named in this filing
- JOHN SHELTON (PRESIDENT)
- LINDA SHELTON (CEO)
- ROB FORD (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a haven to shepherd ministry leaders, their spouses, and families by walking with them through the challenges of: life, marriage, family and ministry. To offer a retreat environment on a personal level through having a time of rest, sabbath & solitude, helping people to experience the "more" that god has for them.
What it reported doing in 2025
Shepherd ministry leaders, their spouses, and families by walking with them through the challenges of: life, marriage, family and ministry. This is done through dinners, coffee appointments, and face to face and video appointments. The ministry served over 200 different leaders and /or spouses in 2025. They also utilzed over 200 volunteers in 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.7%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.22; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 48.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 45.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.7% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.