The Montpelier Contra Dance Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 933527401
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Montpelier, VT, USA
- Phone
- 8022796103
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Folk Arts
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,347
- Expenses
- $59,889
- Assets
- $12,711
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALICE SMOLINSKY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KURT GIAVARA (TREASURER)
- ALICE SMOLINSKY (PRESIDENT)
- THOMAS WEISS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organize participatory traditional contra and square dances that are accessible to all socio-economic groups and where people of all ages, backgrounds, identities, and abilities feel welcome and safe.
What it reported doing in 2025
The montpelier contra dance held 29 dances in 2025 with an average of 167 people per dance or 4,843 total dancers. We hosted two dances on may 17. We are serving a wide range of ages including high school and college students, families, and seniors. The tiered admissions with a low of 5 dollars for kids and low income participants, 12 dollars recommended admission for adults, and 20 dollars for dance supporters continues to work well with the average admission per person between 12 and 13 dollars. We had a good mix of local and regional dance callers and musicians. The mcd board continued to sharpen our organizing skills and support our mission by making a 500 dollar grant to the regional dance organizers conference and three board members attending the conference.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.4%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 99.2%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 56.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 41.2% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.4% of revenue deployed · 99.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.