The Mission at Brady
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474472908
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Brady, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3254569029
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,300
- Expenses
- $49,155
- Assets
- $101,218
- Liabilities
- $48,606
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PADEN BEHRENS (PRESIDENT)
- PHIL CHAVANNE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LAVONTA HARPER (BOARD MEMBER)
- NANCY COOPER (BOARD MEMBER)
- RODNEY BEHRENS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of brady is a non profit organization which exists to tangibly show the love of jesus by meeting the needs in our local community and surrounding communities located in mcculloch county. We do this by engaging local churches and other volunterrs to make homes in need "warm and dry."
What it reported doing in 2025
To show the love of jesus by meeting the needs of our community. This is done by engaging local churches and other volunteers to do home restoration, keeping the resident "warm and dry."
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 12
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.7%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.7%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.06; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 120% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.7% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 17 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Liabilities line sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.