The Misquamicut Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

25 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

A private country club providing golf, tennis, swimming, food and beverage service for its members and their guests.

Food and beverage operation - to provide members and their guests with an opportunity for dining and socializing.

Revenue model: Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.29; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 12.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
Leadership: top reported pay $317K · 25 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $704K reported
Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule M noncash within contributions did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.