The Minnesota Eye Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201500262
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Minnetonka, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9523462192
- Rating
- 96
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Eye Diseases, Blindness & Vision Impairments Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $145,942
- Expenses
- $179,721
- Assets
- $119,605
- Liabilities
- $34,093
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- OMAR E AWAD MD (PRESIDENT)
- ANNA MUELLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- OMAR E AWAD MD (PRESIDENT)
- ANNA MUELLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JANET MARTINEAU (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Vision research and education, eye care for the needy
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, Minnesota eye foundation (mef) conducted its mission of enriching the quality of life of our community members through charitable outreach and continuing education in the field of eye care. Mef directly supports the delivery of eye care services to those in need and through educational opportunities for optometrists, as well as the mission trip experiences for our fellows who serve patients in honduras. Mef exhibits its mission through three key programs: the vision project (tvp), perspectives in eye care (odp) and strides 4 sight (s4s).through the vision project (tvp) which provides medically necessary vision care evaluations and surgeries at no cost for uninsured, low-income patients in need, mef completed a total of 41 vision project surgeries and nine (9) crosslinking procedures for 37 patients during 2024. Tvp is made possible through the assistance of volunteer nurses, staff, surgeons, fellows, anesthetists, and team members who are willing to donate their time, expertise, supplies and equipment.50 surgeries in total for 2024: - 41 surgeries including glaucoma/cataract/cornea related procedures - 9 cross-linking surgeries - 37 patients during 2024 vision project surgery days: - 32 surgeries were completed with 22 patients - 13 volunteer physicians, 45 volunteer staff and 6 interpreters (spanish, french, and hmong) = 64 involvedthe need for vision surgeries for those without insurance has grown in need each year. Tvp did perform additional surgeries outside of the traditional designated window of surgery days providing 9 procedures for 6 patients. Through the fellowship program, mef was able to provide a travel grant to one of the md fellows who was interested and available to participate in this impactful experience in may 2024. Md fellow dr. Mark larson travelled and assisted dr. Mark s. Hansen on his annual honduras mission trip. The week-long journey from sunday 5/26/24 through friday 5/31/24 was aimed at bringing supplies, knowledge, and surgical skills to the residents, fellows, and patients. Clinical assessments and surgical planning with the local team took place daily. Some of the most challenging cases seen at this hospital were designated for this mission trip, and each surgery day was rigorous. Post-operative evaluations with patients and staffing clinic patients with first- and second-year residents took place during the span of this mission trip.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -23.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $177K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.