The Minneapolis Chapter of the American Institute of Architects

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411313113
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$149,798
Expenses
$143,644
Assets
$84,051
Liabilities
$39,496

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rebecca Muchow AIA (President)
  • Daniel Kodet AIA (President-Elect)
  • Dagmara Cygler AIA (Past President)
  • Mary-Margaret Zindren CAE (Executive Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Rebecca Muchow AIA (President)
  • Daniel Kodet AIA (President-Elect)
  • Ashley Vanden Bosch AIA (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of aia minneapolis is to advance a vital architecture profession vibrant communities and architecture that endures. Aia minneapolis provides leadership networking education and outreach opportunities for its members.

What it reported doing in 2025

Membership services - benefits are provided to more than 1700 members of the architecture profession centered in minneapolis as well as the southwestern portion of Minnesota. These services include programs and events for continuing education networking awards and connection to the broader building industry.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 19
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 29.7%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.47; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -36.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 29.7% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.